Top three reasons why big data and cloud are a perfect couple

As more companies get serious about data (big or long) they need to decide the basic question - host data with use of captive data centers or go with a cloud vendor. I present top three reasons why this is an easy question to answer.

1. Cost

Big data implies big storage along with enough compute power to go along with the storage. Anyone who has operated an in-house data center knows that setting up and running data center operations is not cheap. One time equipment fees, cost of personnel, monitoring - it all adds up. On the other hand the new pricing framework now put in place by almost all major cloud providers allows the consumers to only pay for what they consume ("pay for what you eat"). Economies of scale that are available to cloud vendors help drive the cost down for the consumers something they can never achieve by themselves.

2. Security

One of the major reasons, that company executives green light a captive data center is the feeling that it will be more secure. Unless you are running a Fortune 100 company, chances are that any data center you can put up will not be as secure as a cloud hosted deployment. Most cloud providers are certified for various security standards and they do regular audits to keep their certifications intact. "How come we hear of leaks and break-ins?" You ask.  The is true but the risk of that happening in a captive data center is no less even if it is easier to cloak such breaches.

3. Integration

Having your data in the cloud allows you to integrate with many analytics, visualization, and other value added vendors who are also cloud based. In many cases your cloud vendor might already have done some or all of the integration work for you. You can enjoy the benefits of the ecosystem without having to create one.

So, for reasons mentioned above I recommend anyone considering hosting their own data in a captive location to think again.


Popular posts from this blog

Tennis and cool dashboards for the viewer

Image
In the just concluded Wimbledon Tennis Tournament IBM showcased some cool technology. IBM SlamTracker™ - a real time statistics and data visualization platform that leverages IBM's predictive analytics technology. It provides an ‘at a glance’ visual representation of a match using scores and statistics and encourages fans to get more involved by interacting with the data to gain deeper insight into the game. IBM SlamTracker™ analyses over eight years of Grand Slam data (over 41 million data points), to identify patterns in players and their styles. Before each match, IBM analyses historical matches between the players (or between players of similar styles if the players in question have not met before). In the last couple of years IBM did trial runs of SecondSight , which for the first time enabled the viewer to track the direction, speed and distance of players as they moved about the court. Data from SecondSight enables displays such as one below. Hopefully
Read more

NoSQL Database Comparison Chart (only one you need)

Image
Following is a great resource for any one considering different choices for their "NoSQL" style frame work. As always, "one-size-fits-all" approach does * not * work for NoSQL frameworks.  Just as a side note that MongoDB, Cassandra and CouchDB are the top three skills sought out on indeed.com (popular aggregator of job boards) of all the databases in the table below. Having a large pool of talent is always a good thing for your technology choice. Source : International Journal of Database Theory and Application, NoSQL Database: New Era of Databases for Big data Analytics Classification, Characteristics and Comparison, A B M Moniruzzaman and Syed Akhter
Read more